Each student will conduct a Peer Review of 2 other students. Within the Group Wiki go to the page of your allocated person . Click on the Discussion Tab. Add a new post with the heading Peer Review and make useful and informative comments or suggestions.
When conducting a Peer Review of another student's work remember you are making comments about the work and not the person or their ability.
Giving Criticism
Start with what the person did well - and be specific.
Next, discuss what they did not do so well on. Again, provide specifics.
Respond politely and respectfully.
End on a positive note.
Receiving Criticism
Do not take criticism as a personal attack. Instead, think of it as a way to help you to improve your work.
As much as possible, thank each person for their criticism and respond to their suggestions. Be polite and courteous.
If you feel that you are being unfairly criticised, that is, you feel that you are being criticized for something outside the topic , or are being attacked, inform the teacher.
Peer Review Criteria
Spelling, grammar, and format are important !!Write responses in paragraph format.
Courtesy: You have responded in a polite tone and ended evaluation on a positive note.
Specifics: You have provided specific details about what person did and did not do well on.
Total: You have completed 2 Peers reviews as required
Examples of the sorts of comments you could make
All of your sources are reliable and provide excellent background information on this topic.
I think you should reconsider the validity of the internet source in your checklist as the authors at the ABC are not scientists and therefore they could have misinterpreted the evidence from the CSIRO.
You seem to have included a great deal of information which is not related directly to this issue.
You may want to go into more detail about why certain solutions would not work, and you could give examples.
I disagree with your evaluation as xxxxx. In your analysis you said xxxxxxx . However, you made the point that xxxx . If people accept this claim they may think xxxxxxxx .
You need to describe xxxxxx in more detail.
I think you have left out some of the important arguments you made in your analysis. For example, xxxxxxxx
You may want to go into more detail about why xxxxxxxxx , and you could give examples.
You have presented a comprehensive analysis of the evidence .
Your conclusion is well organised into the main arguments supporting your conclusion.
Your conclusions are not based on the evidence you collected
Your evaluation could be improved if you could find an internet source with scientific authors. Such a source would provide more valid evidence.
Each student will conduct a Peer Review of 2 other students. Within the Group Wiki go to the page of your allocated person . Click on the Discussion Tab. Add a new post with the heading Peer Review and make useful and informative comments or suggestions.
Etiquette
Etiquette means being polite - having good manners .Wiki Etiquette for students
Peer Review Etiquette
When conducting a Peer Review of another student's work remember you are making comments about the work and not the person or their ability.Giving Criticism
Start with what the person did well - and be specific.Next, discuss what they did not do so well on. Again, provide specifics.
Respond politely and respectfully.
End on a positive note.
Receiving Criticism
Do not take criticism as a personal attack. Instead, think of it as a way to help you to improve your work.As much as possible, thank each person for their criticism and respond to their suggestions. Be polite and courteous.
If you feel that you are being unfairly criticised, that is, you feel that you are being criticized for something outside the topic , or are being attacked, inform the teacher.
Peer Review Criteria
Spelling, grammar, and format are important !!Write responses in paragraph format.Courtesy: You have responded in a polite tone and ended evaluation on a positive note.
Specifics: You have provided specific details about what person did and did not do well on.
Total: You have completed 2 Peers reviews as required
Examples of the sorts of comments you could make
All of your sources are reliable and provide excellent background information on this topic.I think you should reconsider the validity of the internet source in your checklist as the authors at the ABC are not scientists and therefore they could have misinterpreted the evidence from the CSIRO.
You seem to have included a great deal of information which is not related directly to this issue.
You may want to go into more detail about why certain solutions would not work, and you could give examples.
I disagree with your evaluation as xxxxx. In your analysis you said xxxxxxx . However, you made the point that xxxx . If people accept this claim they may think xxxxxxxx .
You need to describe xxxxxx in more detail.
I think you have left out some of the important arguments you made in your analysis. For example, xxxxxxxx
You may want to go into more detail about why xxxxxxxxx , and you could give examples.
You have presented a comprehensive analysis of the evidence .
Your conclusion is well organised into the main arguments supporting your conclusion.
Your conclusions are not based on the evidence you collected
Your evaluation could be improved if you could find an internet source with scientific authors. Such a source would provide more valid evidence.